One should notice that Justice Turner’s office does not mention the ex parte conversation with Angel Law. Within 5 days of the filing date of this order, plaintiff is file declarations identifying who it wishes to act as its counsel.” Turner Order Justice Turner’s office tells SaveHywd that the plaintiff, SaveHywd, must directly communicate with him without its attorney Richard MacNaughton’s making any reply.
The next day, Justice Turner issues the following order: “A dispute exists as to who represents plaintiff, SAVEHOLLYWOOD.ORG. The reality was that on February 14, 2014, SaveHywd had terminated Frank Angel and Jessica Cheng due to extreme misconduct. The portions in bold highlight the extraordinarily prejudicial (and false) information which was conveyed to Justice Turner on December 18, 2014. Cheng Declaration about Decemex parte conversation between Angel law and Justice Turner’s office
#Savehollywood alternatives for mac trial
Mac Naughton refused to accept that he had been terminated by SaveHoll-ywood.Org and that a motion for sanctions had been filed against him in the trial court. Because of this letter, the clerk was unsure if our Respon-dent’s Brief for SaveHollywood.Org could be filed. Mac Naughton claimed that SaveHollywood.Org would not be filing a respondent’ s brief - a claim made without authorization from or even consultation with SaveHollywood.Org. MacNaughton on December 17, 2014, in which Mr. The reason for this call was because of the confusion caused by a letter filed by Mr. I received a phone call from the Clerk of the Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Five. The Cheng declaration was not written until her last day as an employee of Angel Law and long the Supreme Court had ruled on the matter. To the contrary, on February 14, 2014, SaveHywd had terminated Frank Angel and Jessica Cheng. The conversation was highly prejudicial to SaveHywd as Angel Law was not in fact the attorney for SaveHywd and SaveHywd had not terminated Mr. Our focus will not be on the failure of the attorney, Frank Angel, to disclose, but rather upon the failure of Justice Turner to disclose the secret conversation, which the Court itself had initiated with Angel Law.įollowing is a pertinent section of the declaration by Jessica Cheng, describing the undisclosed ex parte communication. The ex parte communication was on December 18, 2014, but no one told the injured party, SaveHywd, and its attorney, until the following September 21, 2015.
One attorney very belatedly disclosed one particularly egregious ex parte communication between Justice Paul Turner and the law offices of Frank Angel. “Ex parte” is legalese which means that the judge is having communications with only one party. This article will explain one way in which California judges and justices not only turn a blind eye to serious ethical and legal transgressions by attorneys whom they favor, but also the extent to which the judges and justices are willing to actively corrupt the legal system in order to make their friends wealthy while framing innocent people. Judges See ‘Epidemic’ of Prosecutorial Misconduct in State, by Maura DolanĪlthough the three judges did discuss the prosecutorial misconduct in the Baca Case, they did not go into detail about the mechanism of the epidemic of attorney misconduct. What the Ninth Circuit Judges Did Not Tell Us About CorruptionĪs readers of Zwartz Talk know, in January 2015, Judges Kim Wardlaw, Alex Kozinski, and William Fletcher of the federal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals accused the California judges and justices of maintaining a judicial system where attorney misconduct was epidemic. How California Judges Cover-up and Promote Attorney Misconduct for Fun and Profit
0 kommentar(er)
